Legal Opinion

Todtman, Young, Tunick, Nachamie, Hendler, Spizz & Drogin, P. C. v. Richardson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 24, 1998PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiff’s motion granted to the extent that the case is remanded to arbitration, defendants’ attorneys directed to pay $2,000 as sanctions to the Lawyers’ Fund for Client Protection, and the Clerk of the Supreme Court, New York County, is directed to enter judgment in the amount of $2,000 in accordance with 22 NYCRR 130-1.3, said amount to be paid forthwith.

On July 10, 1997, we reversed the dismissal of this action for attorneys’ fees on the ground of lack of subject matter jurisdiction and reinstated the complaint. (231 AD2d 1.) The motion to dismiss was made after the parties, on January…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Todtman, Young, Tunick, Nachamie, Hendler, Spizz & Drogin, P. C. v. RichardsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. Getlan v. Josephthal & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kilmer v. Flocar, Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 2002
  2. Nagel v. GammermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API