Legal Opinion

Patent Scaffolding Co. v. Roosevelt Apartments, Inc.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1933No. 24148. Department TwoPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

In the complaint in this action, there are eleven causes of action, separately stated. The first is for the rental of patented scaffolding machines which were used in the construction of a building. The other causes of action are upon assigned claims for material which went into the construction of the building. The cause was tried to the court, without a jury, and resulted in findings of fact from which the court concluded that a recovery could be had upon each cause of action. Judgment was entered against the defendant for the sum of $3,121.25, from which it appeals.

The facts may be…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. PsarasWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Foster v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Ross v. Kenwood Investment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Watson v. Hecla Mining Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Barnett Bros. v. LynnWashington Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Crown Controls, Inc. v. SmileyWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  2. CKP, Inc. v. GRS Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1991
  3. Fuller v. LindenbaumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  4. Freeman v. NavarreWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Losli v. FosterWashington Supreme Court · 1950

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API