Legal Opinion

Hope Vacuum Cleaner Co. v. Commercial National Bank

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 10, 1917No. 21,028PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Montgomery district court; Thomas J. Flan-NELLY, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

The action was one to recover the proceeds of a check collected by the defendant, drawn to plaintiff’s order and indorsed to the defendant by an agent of the plaintiff who had no authority to make the indorsement. A demurrer was sustained to the plaintiff’s evidence and it appeals.

The plaintiff is a corporation of the state of Missouri, and previous to the transaction out of which the litigation arose was engaged in manufacturing and selling vacuum cleaners. Matt Berryhill was employed to sell and install the plaintiff’s product. He sold a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Boggs v. O. S. Kelly Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1907

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. MacKey-woodard, Inc. v. Citizens State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
  2. Railroad Building, Loan & Savings Ass'n v. Bankers Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1935
  3. Labor Bank & Trust Co. v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  4. Rensselaer Valve Co. v. National Bank of Commerce of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Chamberlin Metal Weatherstrip Co. v. Bank of PleasantonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API