Legal Opinion
Wesley Robert Wells, and v. The People of the State of California, And
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 1, 1965No. 19733_1PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARRIS, District Judge.
This appeal is perfected from an adverse ruling of the United States District Court, Southern District of California, Central Division. That court dismissed appellant Wells’ petition for habeas corpus on grounds that he had failed to exhaust state appellate remedies, 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The questions presented in that action involved the alleged denial of counsel at a hearing in Municipal Court and alleged denial of counsel on appeal. Also, that he was denied the right to communicate with the courts concerning his appeal. The District Court below disposed of these claims…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- McNally v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Aderhold v. SoileauCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933
- People v. ScherbingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- In Re WellsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Bayless v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Nathaniel Brown v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- Allen R. Turk v. Theo White, Warden Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General of the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- People v. WellsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Amos Marshall Arketa v. Lawrence E. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
- People v. Superior Court of Marin CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.