Legal Opinion

In Re Wells

California Supreme Court

Decided September 13, 1950No. Crim. 5114PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.

Wesley Robert Wells, who is confined in San Quentin State Prison under sentence of death, seeks habeas corpus on the grounds that execution of the sentence will deprive him of life without due process and violate other provisions of the federal and state Constitutions. We have concluded that his petition is devoid of merit.

The death penalty was imposed, pursuant to the mandate of the statute, upon Wells’ conviction of violation of section 4500 of the Penal Code: “Every person undergoing a life sentence in a State prison . . . who, with malice aforethought, *891commits an assault upon the person…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Louisiana Ex Rel. Francis v. ResweberSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. People v. WellsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  3. In Re LeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  4. People v. RalphCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Howard v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1906

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. People v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. In Re DixonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. People v. FudgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  4. People v. SidenerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  5. In Re WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API