Legal Opinion

Moody v. City of Orangeburg

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 24, 1995No. 24280PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Burnett, Justice:

This is an appeal from the Master’s order denying Appellant (Moody) an additional rate refund from Respondent (Orange-burg) and denying certification of this matter as a class action. We affirm.

FACTS

Orangeburg owns and operates its own electric utility system and purchases electricity wholesale from the South Carolina Electric and Gas company, Inc. (SCE&G) for resale to its retail customers. Although the wholesale rates which SCE&G charges Orangeburg are regulated by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), neither FERC nor the South Carolina Public Service Commission…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Webb's Fabulous Pharmacies, Inc. v. BeckwithSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. McCall v. BatsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
  3. South Carolina Electric & Gas Co. v. South Carolina Public Service AuthoritySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1949
  4. South Carolina Electric & Gas Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
  5. Looper v. City of EasleySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1934

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Michael v. City of MindenLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API