Moody v. City of Orangeburg
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Burnett, Justice:
This is an appeal from the Master’s order denying Appellant (Moody) an additional rate refund from Respondent (Orange-burg) and denying certification of this matter as a class action. We affirm.
FACTS
Orangeburg owns and operates its own electric utility system and purchases electricity wholesale from the South Carolina Electric and Gas company, Inc. (SCE&G) for resale to its retail customers. Although the wholesale rates which SCE&G charges Orangeburg are regulated by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), neither FERC nor the South Carolina Public Service Commission…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Webb's Fabulous Pharmacies, Inc. v. BeckwithSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- McCall v. BatsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
- South Carolina Electric & Gas Co. v. South Carolina Public Service AuthoritySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1949
- South Carolina Electric & Gas Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
- Looper v. City of EasleySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1934
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Michael v. City of MindenLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1997