Legal Opinion

Looper v. City of Easley

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 2, 1934No. 13764PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. ChiEE Justice BeEasE.

Referring to an alleged contract made by and between him and the defendants in this action, whereby the defendants were to furnish the plaintiff electric current for his ginnery, mills, and buildings, situate without, but contiguous to, the corporate limits of the City of Easley, the gist of the complaint, which we are called upon to consider, is declared in the fourth, fifth, and sixth paragraphs thereof. The fourth and fifth paragraphs, in full, are as follows:

“IV. That heretofore the said defendants, said city - in pursuance…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Childs v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1911
  2. Irvine v. Town of GreenwoodSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1911
  3. Luther v. WheelerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1905
  4. Reeves v. City of EasleySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1932
  5. Farrow v. City Council of CharlestonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1933

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  2. McCall v. BatsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
  3. McKenzie v. CITY OF FLORENCESupreme Court of South Carolina · 1959
  4. McCall ex rel. Andrews v. BatsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
  5. Sunset Cay, LLC v. City of Folly BeachSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API