Legal Opinion

Grant v. Spokane Nat. Bank

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Washington

Decided September 5, 1891PublishedCited by 6 opinions

In Equity. Motion to remand to state court.

1Opinion of the CourtHanford, J.

The object of this suit is to control the official conduct of the receiver of a national bank appointed by a comptroller of the currency, and acting under authority of the national banking laws, in so far as to secure a particular application of .a portion of the funds in his official custody in satisfaction of a claim of the plaintiff against the insolvent bank for money received by it as a collecting agent. I hold that the hank is only a nominal party. The receiver must defend, as he is the one who will be held accountable for any unlawful or unauthorized application or disposition of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Tennessee v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Railroad Co. v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  3. Bock v. PerkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. Feibelman v. PackardSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  5. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. KirkSupreme Court of the United States · 1885

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Guarantee Co. of North Dakota v. HanwayCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900
  2. Wood v. DrakeU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Washington · 1895
  3. Jewett v. WhitcombU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Wisconsin · 1895
  4. Auburn Sav. Bank v. HayesDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1894
  5. Barnette v. Wells Fargo Nevada National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API