Legal Opinion
Attorney General v. Hill-Davis Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided October 11, 1932No. Docket No. 62, Calendar No. 36,740PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPotter, J.
Information in the nature of quo warranto by the attorney general to forfeit the charter of the Hill-Davis Company, Ltd., a partnership association, for failure to appoint an agent in this State, and pay a fee of $2 therefor, as prescribed by Act No. 327, Pub. Acts 1931, to the secretary of State. Defendant denies the State’s right to a judgment of ouster.
1. Section 191 of Act No. 327, Pub. Acts 1931, purports to repeal “Act No. one hundred and ninety-one, Pub. Acts eighteen hundred and seventy- seven, Act No. two hundred and sixteen, Pub. Acts eighteen hundred and eighty-one, Act No.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Great Southern Fire Proof Hotel Company v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Mason v. FinchMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
- Rouse, Hazard & Co. v. DonovanMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- Michigan Trust Co. v. HerpolsheimerMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
- Fred Macey Co. v. MaceyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1905
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ace Tex Corp. v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990
- Brocki v. American Express Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1960
- Brocki v. American Express CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960