Legal Opinion

Lam v. Earlington Machine Works

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided May 25, 1916PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Muhlenberg Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Thomas

Affirming..

The plaintiff (appellee), a corporation, sued the defendant, J. W. Lam and the Hillside Coal Company, to recover from them an alleged balance of account, amounting to $1,492.64, which it is charged to be due from defendants as the unpaid portion of an account for the value of a lot of machinery and material which it had furnished to the defendants for use at the Dovey mines in Muhlenberg county at their instance and request, and, that the defendant, Lam, had repeatedly promised to pay the sum sued for since the completion *385of the furnishing of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stowers v. SingerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1902
  2. Central Kentucky Traction Co. v. CombsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  3. Louisville Water Co. v. Phillips' AdmrCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1906
  4. First National Bank v. Germania Safety Vault & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1902

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Eldridge v. PikeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API