Legal Opinion

Briggs v. Gilbert Grocery Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1927No. 19843PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.

The first ground of reversal of the trial court by the Court of Appeals was the failure to require the plaintiff below to separately state and number the causes of action stated in the amended petition. It is the claim of the plaintiff in error that his employment was continuing in character from 1916 to 1924, and that the same amounted to a single contract. However, the amended petition avers that “plaintiff continued as president and general manager of the corporation until January, 1924; being formally and duly elected from year to year by the board of directors of defendant corporation.”…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Schaffhauser v. Arnholt & Schaefer Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Church v. HarnitCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1929
  2. Klein v. Fisher Foods, Inc.Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · 1965
  3. Merkel v. MaybaughTuscarawas County Court of Common Pleas · 1945
  4. Gilbert Grocery Co. v. BriggsOhio Supreme Court · 1929
  5. State, Ex Rel. Squire v. MillerOhio Court of Appeals · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API