Legal Opinion

People v. Kanze

New Rochelle City Court

Decided November 26, 1951PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFasso, J.

This is a motion for a joint trial of two defendants who are charged by separate informations with violations of section 986 of the Penal Law of the State of New York.

With respect to the defendant Frank Tynan, it is alleged that he engaged in book-making on September 19th, on September 22d, and on September 27th in a restaurant at 9 Huguenot Street, in the city of New Rochelle. The defendant, William Kanze, is alleged to have engaged in book-making at the same place on September 27,1951. The informations do not set forth the precise time.

The application of the People is based upon the…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Allen v. Grella, New York County Courts1956
  2. People v. De MoreAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1965
  3. People v. PennAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API