Legal Opinion

People v. De More

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided March 3, 1965PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The trial court had no power to order a consolidation because the separate information filed against each defendant failed to allege the existence of a common scheme or plan or concerted action ¡by the defendants as required by section 279 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Thus each defendant was deprived of a fundamental right to a separate trial upon the evidence adduced in the case against him alone.

In People v. Morett (272 App. Div. 96, 98 [1st Dept., 1947]) the court said: “On retrial, each defendant should be tried separately on the information directed against him, and his guilt or…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. KanzeNew Rochelle City Court · 1951
  2. Allen v. Grella, New York County Courts1956

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rocca v. LaneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  2. People v. BanksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API