Legal Opinion

Hirth v. Marano

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 11, 1933No. Appeal 300PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

James, J.,

Plaintiff recovered a verdict in the court below for injuries suffered in a collision between an automobile in which plaintiff was riding and a truck of the defendant. Defendant’s motion for judgment non ob-stante veredicto, based upon the refusal of his point for binding instructions, was dismissed and judgment entered upon the verdict, from which judgment defendant has taken the present appeal.

On the morning of June 5, 1931 about 2:30 A. M., the plaintiff was severely injured while a passenger in an automobile, riding on the back seat, which was being driven on the Buena…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Grimes v. Pennsylvania R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. Hoffman v. Pittsburgh & Lake Erie R. RSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  3. Cupples, Jr. v. YearickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  4. George v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  5. Lapinco v. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McAllister v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Vierling v. FrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  3. Wolfe v. BeardsleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API