Miller v. Kirksey
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Judge Richardson
— Affirming.
We are confronted with the duty to construe and apply to the admitted facts so much of the Revenue Act of 1902 which has since become section 4153, Kentucky Statutes, and that which has since come to be section 4151-2. The parties agree in their briefs that the Revenue Act of 1906 copied these two sections (24 and 25) “without noticing that it had injected between the two some other sections.” For this reason,
“the peculiar reading now in section 4151-2 (Carroll’s Statutes 1930 Ed.), ‘in the next section/ when the next section is not literally…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. FreemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
- Mosle v. BidwellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1904
- Pannell v. Louisville Tobacco Warehouse Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1902
- Crab Orchard Banking Co. v. SaundersCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
- Russell, Sheriff v. County Bd. Ed. Logan Cty.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Smith v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1954
- Lach v. MAN O'WAR, LLCKentucky Supreme Court · 2008
- Lach v. MAN O'WAR, LLCKentucky Supreme Court · 2008
- Smith v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1954