Legal Opinion

Acetylene Gas Co. v. Oliver

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 10, 1996No. 69621, 69651PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRANDALL, Presiding Judge.

A jury found for defendants on plaintiffs breach of contract claim and for defendant, Thomas Oliver, on his counterclaim for tor-tious interference with a contract or business expectancy. The trial court entered judgment notwithstanding the verdict on Thomas Oliver’s counterclaim and judgment for defendants on plaintiffs breach of contract claim. Thomas Oliver appeals and plaintiff cross-appeals. We affirm in part, reverse in part and remand.

Plaintiff, Acetylene Gas Company (“AGC”), manufactures compressed gases. On May 14, 1965, AGC and Ray Oliver entered into…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Nazeri v. Missouri Valley CollegeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. Leggett v. Missouri State Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
  3. Community Title Co. v. Roosevelt Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Missouri · 1990
  4. Martin v. YeohamMissouri Court of Appeals · 1967
  5. Slone v. Purina Mills, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1996

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Richard Ruiz and Foundation Anchoring Systems, Inc., Plaintiffs-Cross v. A.B. Chance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
  2. Joy v. MorrisonSupreme Court of Missouri · 2008
  3. Koger v. Hartford Life Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Whiteman Tire, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1997
  5. Steve Hibbs v. Brian BergerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API