Hurst-Rosche Engineers, Inc. v. Commercial Union Insurance
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
COFFEY, Circuit Judge.
Hurst-Rosche Engineers, Inc. (“Hurst-Rosche”), appeals the district court’s orders granting summary judgment in favor of its two insurers, Commercial Union Insurance Company, also known as American Employers Insurance Company (“American”) and Cincinnati Insurance Company (“Cincinnati”). The district court held that the professional liability exclusion clauses contained in each of two commercial liability policies issued to Hurst-Rosche by American and Cincinnati relieved the insurers of any duty to defend or indemnify Hurst-Rosche against libel and tortious interference…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Crum & Forster Managers Corp. v. Resolution Trust Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1993
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Wilkin Insulation Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1991
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. PeppersIllinois Supreme Court · 1976
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hurst-Rosche Engineers, Incorporated v. Commercial Union Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Cincinnati Insurance v. American Hardware Manufacturers Ass'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
- Gould & Ratner v. Vigilant InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
- Cincinnati Insurance Company v. American Hardware Manufacturers AssociationAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
- Gould & Ratner v. Vigilant InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.