Legal Opinion
Deming v. Osinski
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided December 30, 1970No. 69-821PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Per curiam
The issue raised by this appeal is whether, as a matter of law, the trial court properly instructed the jury on contributory negligence. We think that it did not.
The pertinent statutory provisions are R. C. 4511.42 and 4511.01. R. C. 4511.42 states:
“The operator of a vehicle, streetcar, or trackless trolley intending to turn to the left shall yield the right of way to any vehicle, streetcar, or trackless trolley approaching from the opposite direction.”
R. C. 4511.01 (TT) states:
“ ‘Right of way’ means the right of a vehicle, streetcar, trackless trolley, or pedestrian to proceed…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Morris v. BloomgreenOhio Supreme Court · 1933
- Heidle v. BaldwinOhio Supreme Court · 1928
- George Ast Candy Co. v. KlingOhio Supreme Court · 1929
3Cited by30 opinions
- Vavrina v. GreczanikOhio Court of Appeals · 1974
- Kurz v. Great Parks of Hamilton Cty.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016
- Almanza v. KohlhorstOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
- Lumaye v. JohnsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
- Davis v. Brown Local SchoolsOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.