Legal Opinion
Vigilant Insurance v. EEMAX, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 24, 2005No. CIV.A. 02-1825(JMF)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
FACCIOLA, United States Magistrate Judge.
This case is before the court upon consent of the parties to trial before a United States Magistrate Judge. On February 4, 2005, I ordered the parties to brief the question of whether this court has jurisdiction over the third-party claims becáuse the primary action has settled and diversity is lacking between the parties that remain in this case.
The primary action involved a suit by plaintiff Vigilant Insurance Company against defendants EEMAX, Inc. (“EE-MAX”) and PVI Industries, LLC for damages caused by the malfunction of an EE-MAX…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Doddy v. Oxy USA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- Women Prisoners of the District of Columbia Department of Corrections v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Financial General Bankshares, Inc. v. Eugene J. Metzger, Financial General Bankshares, Inc., Cross-Appellant v. Eugene J. MetzgerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- National Rifle Association of America v. Nra FoundationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026