Legal Opinion
Green v. City of Stuart
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided April 29, 1943No. 10541PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.
The proceeding from which this appeal comes was one for the approval of a plan of composition of all of its bonded indebtedness and one judgment. It was begun on the petition of the City of Stuart filed under the provisions of Chapter 9 of the Bankruptcy Act.1 Two of the appellants, Green and Newport Culvert Company, claim to be creditors of the City. Five of them, Turner, Van Tassel, Selser, Gosling and Van Slyck, claim to be owners of property in and adjacent thereto. The appeal of Green and Newport Culvert Company is from that part of the interlocutory decree of…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In Re Willacy County Water Control & Improvement Dist.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1940
- Poinsett Lumber & Mfg. Co. v. Drainage Dist. No. 7 of Poinsett CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941
- Leco Properties, Inc. v. R. E. Crummer & Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1942
- Ware v. R. E. Crummer & Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1942
- United States ex rel. Societe de Condensation et D'Applications Mecaniques v. CoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ashton v. Town of Deerfield BeachCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1946
- Ropico, Inc. v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1976