Legal Opinion

Dzencol v. Liquor Control Commission

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1948No. Docket No. 90, Calendar No. 43,831PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoyles, J.

In 1937 the- appellant was granted a license to sell intoxicating liquor at his place of business known as the Cass Bar in Detroit, renewed annually thereafter until 1946 at which time he-was cited before the eommision for violation of the liquor control act. It was charged that he was not the sole owner but that he had a partner, although he had represented himself as sole owner in obtaining the subsequent license renewals. At the hearing before the entire commission, plaintiff’s license was revoked. On appeal in the nature of certiorari, on March 31, 1947, the order of revocation was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Case v. Liquor Control CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Prujansky v. Liquor Control CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1946

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Triantafillou v. Liquor Control CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Beels v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API