Dzencol v. Liquor Control Commission
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBoyles, J.
In 1937 the- appellant was granted a license to sell intoxicating liquor at his place of business known as the Cass Bar in Detroit, renewed annually thereafter until 1946 at which time he-was cited before the eommision for violation of the liquor control act. It was charged that he was not the sole owner but that he had a partner, although he had represented himself as sole owner in obtaining the subsequent license renewals. At the hearing before the entire commission, plaintiff’s license was revoked. On appeal in the nature of certiorari, on March 31, 1947, the order of revocation was…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Case v. Liquor Control CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
- Prujansky v. Liquor Control CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
3Cited by2 opinions
- Triantafillou v. Liquor Control CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
- Beels v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1953