Legal Opinion
Prujansky v. Liquor Control Commission
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided June 28, 1946No. Docket No. 31, Calendar No. 43,330PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.
Herman Prujansky, plaintiff herein, had issued to him by the Michigan liquor control commission a class 0 license on May 1, 1945. Under that license he was permitted to conduct business as the sole owner of Turk’s Music Bar in Detroit. On January 2, 1946, the commission lodged a violation charge against. Prujansky by serving him with a notice which read:
“We are in receipt of a violation report which alleges that you have made false and fraudulent statements to the Michigan liquor control commission for the purpose of inducing the commission to refrain from taking action, by representing…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Case v. Liquor Control CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
3Cited by3 opinions
- Dzencol v. Liquor Control CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
- Glicker v. Michigan Liquor Control CommissionDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1947
- Triantafillou v. Liquor Control CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1948