Frazier v. Neilsen & Co.
Idaho Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
SWANSTROM, Judge.
Neilsen & Company appeals from the summary judgment awarding the Fraziers the money owing on a promissory note secured by a deed of trust on certain real property. Neilsen argues that an amendment to I.C. § 45-1503 by House Bill 274, passed during the 1989 legislative session, is applicable to this case and requires liquidation of the secured property before any other assets of the borrower can be reached for payment of the debt. For the following reasons, we disagree and we affirm the summary judgment.
The facts of this case are set out in detail in Frazier v. Neilsen & Co.,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gailey v. Jerome CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1987
- City of Garden City v. City of BoiseIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
- St. Benedict's Hospital v. County of Twin FallsIdaho Court of Appeals · 1984
- Office of the State Engineer v. Curtis Park Manor Water Users Ass'nNevada Supreme Court · 1985
- Frazier v. Neilsen & Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Curtis v. FirthIdaho Supreme Court · 1993
- Farmers National Bank v. ShireyIdaho Supreme Court · 1994
- Swanson v. SwansonIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
- Brent Regan v. Jeff OwenIdaho Supreme Court · 2018
- Alcala v. Verbruggen Palletizing Solutions, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2023
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.