Legal Opinion

Ohio State Chiropractic Ass'n v. Humana Health Plan Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 9, 2016No. 15-3130PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOGGS, Circuit Judge.

When Humana discovered that it had accidentally paid chiropractors more than was required by Medicare, it decided to withhold portions of subsequent payments. The chiropractors brought suit in state court and Humana used the officer-removal statute to remove the case to federal court. Humana does not act under a federal agency in its capacity as a Medicare Advantage organization. We therefore reverse and remand with instructions that the district court remand this case to the state court from which it was removed.

I

Medicare Advantage (MA) allows individuals to receive…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Gunn v. MintonSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  2. TRW Inc. v. AndrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Heckler v. RingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. King v. BurwellSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  5. Willingham v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Melissa Mays v. City of Flint, Mich.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
  2. Global Rescue Jets, LLC v. Kaiser Foundation Health PlanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
  3. Tenet HealthSystem GB, Inc. v. Care Improvement Plus South Central Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017
  4. Prime Healthcare Huntington Beach, LLC v. Scan Health PlanDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2016
  5. Premier Inpatient Partners LLC v. Aetna Health and Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2019

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API