Connell v. Copeland
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER
JOHN D. BATES, District Judge.
Adele Connell, a Colonel in the United States Army, alleges that Dr. Annesley Copeland committed medical malpractice while performing surgery on her. The United States seeks to substitute itself for Dr. Copeland, asserting that because Dr. Copeland was a federal employee during the alleged incident, Connell’s exclusive remedy under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2671 et seq., is a suit for damages against the United States. The government also seeks to dismiss the case, contending that the Feres doctrine bars Connell’s suit…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Feres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Osborn v. HaleySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Gutierrez De Martinez v. LamagnoSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.