Legal Opinion

Young v. United States

District Court, S.D. California

Decided May 18, 1993No. Civ. No. 90-1334-R(BTM)PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER RE DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF PLAINTIFF’S TAX RETURNS

MOSKOWITZ, United States Magistrate Judge:

Jo Ann Young brought this action under the Federal Tort Claims Act for injuries to her allegedly caused by a defective roll-up steel door at the North Island Naval Air Station in Coronado, California. Past and future lost wages are a substantial part of plaintiffs claim for damages. The United States requested production of plaintiffs’ tax returns for a period before and after the date of the injury. Plaintiff produced her tax returns for the two years…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Feres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  4. Lorillard v. PonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Moor v. County of AlamedaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Playboy Enterprises, Inc. v. WellesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1999
  2. United States ex rel. Burroughs v. DeNardi Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 1996
  3. Kd Ex Rel. Dieffenbach v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2010
  4. Syposs v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1998
  5. Tucker v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2001

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API