Iran Express Lines v. Sumatrop, Ag, a Foreign Corporation, Central Soya, International and Central Soya Co., Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BUTZNER, Circuit Judge:
The principal question raised by this appeal is whether freight for a partial shipment of cargo which had been loaded aboard a vessel is subject to maritime garnishment. The district court held that it was not because the affreightment contract was executory. We believe that the contract was sufficiently executed to sustain the garnishment, and consequently, we reverse.
Iran Express Lines filed this suit in admiralty against Sumatrop AG a foreign corporation, for damages resulting from the alleged breach of a time charter. To provide security for a favorable arbitration…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- The EddySupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Osaka Shosen Kaisha v. Pacific Export Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Bulkley v. Naumkeag Steam Cotton Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1860
- Schirmer Stevedoring Co. v. Seaboard Stevedoring Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- William A. Robinson v. O. F. Shearer & Sons, Inc. And Royal Globe Insurance CompaniesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
3Cited by11 opinions
- Reibor International Limited v. Cargo Carriers (Kacz-Co.) Ltd., Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company and the Royal Bank of Canada, Garnishees-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Engineering Equipment Co. v. SS SELENEDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1978
- Diakan Love, S.A. v. Al-Haddad Bros. Enterprises Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1984
- Interocean Shipping Co. v. M/V LYGARIADistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1981
- Union Planters National Bank v. World Energy Systems AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.