Sauer v. McClintic-Marshall Construction Co.

Upon a former trial of this case a judgment in favor of plaintiffs in the sum of $1,026.34, which included interest, was reversed, for two reasons:

First. Because the declaration was wanting in specific allegations that plaintiffs furnished to defendant “complete information for detail drawings” under the following clause of the contract:

*579“All material is to be delivered f. o. b. cars in Ann Arbor, within eight to ten weeks after receipt of complete information for detail drawings.”

Second. Because the verdict was held to be against the weight of the evidence, and contrary to law upon the…