Legal Opinion
Fayson v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided December 5, 1996No. 95-4085PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
684 So.2d 270 (1996)
Ralph FAYSON, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 95-4085.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
December 5, 1996.
Howard Lidsky, Gainesville, for Appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General; Douglas Gurnic and Edward C. Hill, Jr., Assistant Attorneys General, for Appellee.
2Per curiam
In the instant appeal, appellant claims that the jury rendered a legally inconsistent verdict that requires his conviction for aggravated battery be vacated. We disagree and affirm.
Appellant was charged in a four-count information with burglary of a dwelling with a battery (Count…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
3Cases cited9 opinions
- Mahaun v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
- Redondo v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
- Gonzalez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- State v. PowellSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
- Gonzalez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by4 opinions
- Fayson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1997
- Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
- Dimatteo v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
- Steve Senelus v. Attorney General, State of FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020