State v. Powell
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
We have for review a decision passing upon the following question from the First District Court of Appeal certified to be of great public importance:
DOES THE "RULE OF CONSISTENCY" EXCEPTION, AS IT RELATES TO A JURY VERDICT IN A SINGLE CASE AND TRIAL WHERE ALL BUT ONE OF THE CO-CONSPIRATORS ARE ACQUITTED, REMAIN VIABLE IN FLORIDA FOLLOWING THE DECISIONS IN UNITED STATES v. POWELL, 469 U.S. 57 [105 S.Ct. 471, 83 L.Ed.2d 461] (1984) AND UNITED STATES v. ANDREWS, 850 F.2d 1557 (11TH CIR. 1988), CERT. DENIED, 488 U.S. 1032 [109 S.Ct. 842, 102 L.Ed.2d 974] (1989), THE LATTER OF WHICH OVERRULED…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Garcia, Appeal of Jose A. Figueroa-Rivera, Gabriel Grant, Celina Wilson-GrantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- George Herman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
- Mahaun v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
- United States of America, Cross-Appellant v. Nolberto Zuniga-Salinas, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2007
- Peterson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
- State v. ConnellySupreme Court of Florida · 1999
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- Fayson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1997
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.