Legal Opinion

State v. Powell

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided May 30, 1996No. 86561PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

We have for review a decision passing upon the following question from the First District Court of Appeal certified to be of great public importance:

DOES THE "RULE OF CONSISTENCY" EXCEPTION, AS IT RELATES TO A JURY VERDICT IN A SINGLE CASE AND TRIAL WHERE ALL BUT ONE OF THE CO-CONSPIRATORS ARE ACQUITTED, REMAIN VIABLE IN FLORIDA FOLLOWING THE DECISIONS IN UNITED STATES v. POWELL, 469 U.S. 57 [105 S.Ct. 471, 83 L.Ed.2d 461] (1984) AND UNITED STATES v. ANDREWS, 850 F.2d 1557 (11TH CIR. 1988), CERT. DENIED, 488 U.S. 1032 [109 S.Ct. 842, 102 L.Ed.2d 974] (1989), THE LATTER OF WHICH OVERRULED…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. Garcia, Appeal of Jose A. Figueroa-Rivera, Gabriel Grant, Celina Wilson-GrantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
  3. George Herman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
  4. Mahaun v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
  5. United States of America, Cross-Appellant v. Nolberto Zuniga-Salinas, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2007
  2. Peterson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  3. State v. ConnellySupreme Court of Florida · 1999
  4. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  5. Fayson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1997

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API