Thigpen v. Vidalia Chemical Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.
1. The copy of the mortgage attached to the foreclosure affidavit was sufficiently verified to meet the requirements of the Civil Code, § 32-86, by the statement contained in the affidavit that the defendant was indebted to the plaintiff “on a certain mortgage a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part of the affidavit.” Bainbridge Stock Co. v. Krause-McFarlin Co., 8 Ga. App. 220 (2) (68 S. E. 1013) ; Hardy v. Luke, 18 Ga. App. 423 (89 S. E. 540).
2. Moreover, in Bosworth v. Matthews, 74 Ga. 822, the requirement as to annexing to the affidavit the mortgage or a copy thereof was held to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hardy v. LukeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
- Hillis v. Comer & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
- Bainbridge Stock Co. v. Kráuse-McFarlin Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
- Bosworth & Jossey v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1885
3Cited by3 opinions
- Simpson v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
- Tatham v. LanierCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
- Little v. Peoples BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940