Legal Opinion

Bainbridge Stock Co. v. Kráuse-McFarlin Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 20, 1910No. 2080PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Levy and claim; from city court of Bainbridge — Judge Harrell'. My 1, 1909. ■

1Opinion of the CourtRussell, J.

1. An affidavit made to foreclose a mortgage under section 2754 of the Civil Code of 1895, and which stated that the defendant mortgagor had “placed himself in some one of the positions where process of attachment could legally issue against him,” was amendable; and the plaintiff should have been allowed to amend, as he offered to do, by stating that the defendant was a non-resident of the State, and that this was ground' of attachment relied upon.

2. The copy of the mortgage, attached to the foreclosure affidavit, was verified by the statement in the affidavit. In any event the plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Collins v. TaylorSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hardy v. LukeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
  2. Thigpen v. Vidalia Chemical Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
  3. Wilensky v. AgoosCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API