Legal Opinion
Thorpe v. Retirement Plan of the Pillsbury Co.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 4, 1996No. Nos. 95-4030, 95-4033PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PAUL KELLY, Jr., Circuit Judge.
Defendants, the retirement and welfare plans of Pillsbury Company (“Pillsbury”) and the American Federation of Grain Workers (AFL-CIO-CLC) (“Union”), appeal the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Plaintiff James T. Thorpe on the issue of whether Plaintiff was entitled to early retirement benefits under Defendants’ retirement and welfare plans. Plaintiff appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Defendants on the issue of whether Defendants’ actions constituted section 1024(b)(4) informational violations of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Linda K. Moothart v. A. Gary Bell, Bradley P. Pollock, Bell & Pollock, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Jim L. Woolsey v. Marion Laboratories, Inc. Marion Laboratories, Inc., Profit Sharing PlanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Blue Circle Cement, Inc. v. Board of County Commissioners of the County of RogersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Shefton Gordon v. United States Steel Corporation, United States Steel and Carnegie Pension FundCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Cottrill v. Sparrow, Johnson & Ursillo, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- North Cypress Medical Center Operating Co. v. Cigna HealthcareDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2011
- Deboard v. Sunshine Mining & Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- United Steel, Paper & Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial & Service Workers International Union v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- R. Charles Deboard Lillian J. Deboard William T. Wood Mary E. Wood Lucille M. K Istler Knox Van Hoy Martha Van Hoy, and v. Sunshine Mining and Refining Company Sunshine Precious Metals Inc. Woods Research and Development Corporation, and R. Charles Deboard Lillian J. Deboard William T. Wood Mary E. Wood Lucille M. Kistler Knox Van Hoy Martha Van Hoy v. Sunshine Mining and Refining Company Sunshine Precious Metals Inc. Woods Research and Development CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.