Legal Opinion
Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co. v. Eveland
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided May 28, 1926No. 7046PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SANBORN, Circuit Judge.
The px'operty of a railway company in the state of South Dakota, used and usable in the operation of its lines in that state, is required by its statutes to be assessed for taxation by its state tax commission as of the preceding May 1st on July 7th in each year. The railway company is required to furnish to the tax commission a statement of the amount and’Value of its property in that state of the character described as of the preceding December 31st. The tax commission is required to give the railway company 10 days’ notice of its proposed assessment and a hearing…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Taylor v. SecorSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Greene v. Louisville & Interurban RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Cummings v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Adams Express Co. v. Ohio State AuditorSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Raymondv v. Chicago Union Traction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Northern Pac. Ry. Co. v. Adams CountyDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1932
- Bailey v. MeganCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
- Lehigh Valley R. Co. of New Jersey v. MartinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1938
- State Ex Rel. Public Service Commission v. Southern Pac. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1938
- Pleasant v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.