Legal Opinion · Concurrence
Parks Ex Rel. Parks v. Parks
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided October 9, 1940Published
1ConcurrenceStacy, C. J.
WINBORNE, J., joins in concurring opinion. The complaint is as follows:
"1. That plaintiff and defendants are residents of Surry County, North Carolina, and were such at the time of the institution of this action.
"2. That plaintiff, Graham Hartwell Parks, is a minor under the age of 17 years, and was under the age of 17 years at the times hereinafter set forth and complained of.
"3. That the defendant, Bertha Marie Bowman Parks, is a minor under the age of 21 years, she being about 20 years of age. That Arthur W. Mewshaw has been appointed guardian ad litem for said Bertha Marie Bowman Parks.
"4.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Portwood v. PortwoodCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
- State v. . KennedySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1877
- State v. . ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
- Pridgen v. . PridgenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- Koonce v. . WallaceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1859
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.