Legal Opinion

Pridgen v. . Pridgen

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 23, 1932PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

For the purpose of showing that the decree of divorce rendered by the court in Georgia is without legal validity in North Carolina the plaintiff introduced the judgment roll, from which it appears that the defendant in the action was served with constructive and not with personal service of process. If the decree is a nullity here the plaintiff is not estopped by its introduction, “for what the law pronounces void cannot estop.” Gathings v. Williams, 27 N. C., 487. We must therefore direct our investigation to the legal efficacy in this State of the decree granted by the Georgia court.

Between…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Haddock v. HaddockSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  3. Maynard v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  4. Atherton v. AthertonSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  5. Wisconsin, Minnesota & Pacific Railroad v. JacobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1900

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Williams v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. State v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  3. Carpenter v. CarpenterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  4. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  5. Howe v. HoweSupreme Court of Virginia · 1942

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API