Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Jackson

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided April 5, 1926PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Foley, S.

This is a contested probate proceeding. The decree denying probate to the propounded paper, is before me for settlement. A question has arisen as to the allowance of costs to the various parties interested. The proponent requests the surrogate to allow to him, pursuant to section 278 of the Surrogate’s Court Act (as amd. by Laws of 1925, chap. 581), his costs and his expenses for counsel fees, services of handwriting experts and other purposes incurred in his unsuccessful attempt to sustain the will. The proponent asks that the amount of these expenses be paid out of the estate left…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Marden v. . DorthyNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  2. In re the Estate of ParsonsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1923
  3. In re Proving the Alleged Last Will & Testament of MarshallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In re the Probate of the Will of LachatNew York Surrogate's Court · 1944
  2. In re the Estate of KaufmannNew York Surrogate's Court · 1966
  3. In re the Estate of O'DowdNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937
  4. In re the Estate of RobertsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
  5. In re the Will of ReevesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API