Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Kaufmann

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided June 29, 1966PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

S. Samuel Di Falco, S.

The attorney for the proponent of the will has instituted this proceeding pursuant to the provisions of section 278 of the Surrogate’s Court Act for an order fixing an allowance to him for services rendered to the proponent and *561for a direction that the allowance fixed be paid to him out of the decedent’s general estate.

Although the temporary administrator and the successful contestants dispute the value placed upon those services by the petitioner, the extensive nature of the services rendered cannot be disputed. The litigation in this matter has extended over a period…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In Re Proving the Will of StaigerNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. In re the Estate of O'BrienNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
  3. In Re the Accounting of LimbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
  4. In re Proving the Alleged Last Will & Testament of MarshallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
  5. In re the Probate of the Will of LachatNew York Surrogate's Court · 1944

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re Will of LandsmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999
  2. Matter of Estate of HonerudNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Estate of BrideauSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
  4. In re the Probate of the Will of KaufmannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
  5. Angelos v. BalafasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API