Legal Opinion

Condon v. Dehart

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 12, 1915PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Attachment. Before Judge Jones. Habersham superior court. November 10, 1913.

1Per curiam

1. Where an attachment was issued, levied, and returned to the superior court,, and in proper time a declaration in attachment was filed, which was headed with the name of the case and commenced with the allegation that the plaintiff showed to the court that the attachment had been issued and levied, it was amendable by adding an address to the superior court.

2. The declaration in attachment was not subject to any of the grounds of demurrer urged against it.(a) The first ground of the demurrer was not referred to in the brief of the plaintiffs in error, and will be treated as abandoned.

3. A…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Johnson v. HopkinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
  2. West v. Gainesville National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  3. Bugg v. Perry & FairclothCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
  4. Buttrill v. TaylorSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API