PT Air Watchers v. Department of Ecology
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJ.M. Johnson, J.
¶1 In this case, we are asked to consider whether the Department of Ecology, in determining that no environmental impact statement (EIS) was necessary for a proposed energy cogeneration project, failed to adequately consider the effects of carbon dioxide emissions and demand for woody biomass1 from the state’s forests. We are also asked to consider whether the project is exempt from the EIS requirement as part of an energy recovery facility that existed before January 1, 1989. Ecology adequately reviewed the relevant information in determining that the project would not have significant…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Davis v. Department of LicensingWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- City of Redmond v. Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Port of Seattle v. Pollution Control Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- Ancheta v. DalyWashington Supreme Court · 1969
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Spokane County v. Eastern Washington Growth Management Hearings BoardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- Center For Sustainable Economy, Resps V. Wa State Dept Of Natural Resources, AppsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2026
- Center For Sustainable Economy, Resps V. Wa State Dept Of Natural Resources, AppsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2026
- Eric Hirst, V Growth Management Hearings BdCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- Makah Indian Tribe, V. Commissioner Of Public Lands Hilary FranzCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.