Legal Opinion
Whirlpool Corp. v. CIT Group/Business Credit, Inc.
District Court, D. Hawaii
Decided April 15, 2003No. CV 01-00187 DAE-BMKPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AFFIRMING MAGISTRATE ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART CIT GROUP/BUSINESS CREDIT, INC.’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND ITS FIRST AMENDED CROSS-CLAIM
DAVID ALAN EZRA, Chief Judge.
Pursuant to Local Rule 7.2(d), the court finds this matter suitable for disposition without a hearing. After reviewing Defendant/Cross-Claimant THE CIT GROUP/BUSINESS CREDIT, INC.’s (“Defendant CIT GROUP”) Appeal and the supporting and opposing memoranda, the court AFFIRMS the Magistrate Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part CIT GROUP/BUSINESS CREDIT, INC.’s Motion for Leave to Amend its First Amended…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Jerome Grimes v. City and County of San Francisco, Defendant-Cross-Defendant-Appellee, and Nathan Johnson, Defendant-Cross-Claimant-Appellant. Jerome Grimes v. City and County of San Francisco, Defendant-Cross-Defendant-Appellant, and Nathan Johnson, Defendant-Cross-Claimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- In Re Mortgageamerica Corporation, Debtor. The American National Bank of Austin v. Mortgageamerica CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company v. Pepsico, Inc., Pepsico, Inc., Third-Party v. Banner Industries, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Barnett v. SternCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Glenny v. LangdonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Brooks v. Dana Nance & Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2007
- Brooks v. Dana Nance & Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2007
- GIGA WATT INCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Washington · 2021
- In Re: Neil O'Donnel v.Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2005