Legal Opinion

Montgomery's Estate

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 7, 1918No. Appeal, No. 133PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal, No. 133, Oct. T., 1917, by Robert Thompson, from decree of O. O. Allegheny Co., Feb. T., 1917, No. 100, dismissing exceptions to adjudication in Estate of Samuel Montgomery, Deceased. Exceptions to report of auditing judge.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 133, Oct. T., 1917, by Robert Thompson, from decree of O. O. Allegheny Co., Feb. T., 1917, No. 100, dismissing exceptions to adjudication in Estate of Samuel Montgomery, Deceased. Exceptions to report of auditing judge. The facts appear.from the following opinion by Miller, J.: Two claims are presented by Robert Thompson; one a note of $3,000.00 dated October 1, 1903, on which there is a credit allowed of $1,000.00, leaving a balance due with interest of $2,169.00; the other, a general claim not evidenced by any writing, in the sum of $5,896.00, with interest from January 1, 1904,…

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

The decree of the court below is affirmed on the opinion of the learned auditing judge.

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Van Diest v. TowleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1947
  2. Barr v. LuckenbillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  3. Hathaway v. BottenfieldSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923
  4. Nevin v. Caldwell Et Ux.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API