Ackerman v. Channel Commercial Co.
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtCraig, J.
The appeal in this case is based upon alleged error in ruling upon the admission of testimony and the claim that the findings are not supported by the- evidence. The court rendered judgment against the defendant on the complaint for $538.65, and for the defendant on the counterclaim for $70.63. The action is for goods, wares, and merchandise sold and delivered, and the counterclaim -is for commissions earned under contract. Plaintiff was a manufacturer of a polish and did business under the name of “Volrox Manufacturing Company.’’ Defendant was engaged in the wholesale grocery business. The…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Harrison v. McCormickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Robinson v. American Fish & Oyster Co.California Court of Appeal · 1911
- Southern Pacific Co. v. Von Schmidt Dredge Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
- Montgomery v. DornCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
3Cited by2 opinions
- Evinger v. MacDougallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Sharp v. E. D. Leavitt & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931