Fischer v. Revett
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
GARRARD, Judge.
The Fischers, owners of an alleged ser-vient tenement, appeal the trial court’s decision establishing an implied easement in favor of the Revetts, owners of the claimed dominant tenement.
Revetts and Fischers are neighbors with a common border approximately 330 feet long running from the street side of their lots to the back line of the lots. A driveway on Revetts’ lot terminates in a loop, a portion of which encroaches upon Fischers’ lot. This encroachment, in the shape of an arc, consisting of the eastern portion of the loop, intrudes about ten feet into Fischers’ land and…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. PattersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Searcy v. La GrotteIndiana Court of Appeals · 1978
- State v. Innkeepers of New Castle, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1979
- Krueger v. BeechamIndiana Court of Appeals · 1945
- Hartwig v. BrademasIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
3Cited by6 opinions
- Reed v. LuznyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
- Whitt v. FerrisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
- Hysell v. KimmelIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- Fischer v. RevettIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
- Ronald G. Arnold and B. Candi Arnold v. Allen Robert Linnemeier and Kathy Sue LinnemeierIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.