Legal Opinion

Dehart v. Independent School District No. 1 of Tulsa County

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided March 18, 2011No. 107,964. Released for Publication by Order of the Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, Division No. 3PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LARRY JOPLIN, Judge.

{1 Plaintiff/Appellant, Naney DeHart, seeks review of the trial court's order granting the summary judgment motion of Defendant, Tulsa Public Schools, on Plaintiff's claims against Defendant for breach of contract, violation of the Teacher Due Process Act of 1990 and violation of Plaintiffs due process rights under the 5th and 14th Amendments of the United States Constitution.

2 Plaintiff, Naney DeHart, was first employed with Tulsa Public Schools (TPS or school district) in 1998. She taught in the TPS system for two years, until the conclusion of the 1994-1995 school year.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Fanning v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
  2. Burdick v. Independent School District No. 52Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  3. School District No. 39, Pottawatomie County v. SheltonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  4. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF INDEPENDENT SCH. DIST. NO. 48, HUGHES CTY. v. RivesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
  5. Strong v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Utter v. ColclazierCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
  2. EEC, Inc. v. Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API