Legal Opinion
EEC, Inc. v. Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided January 3, 2012No. 11-6121UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
JOHN C. PORFILIO, Senior Circuit Judge.
Defendant Baker Hughes Inteq, Inc. (Baker) 1 appeals the district court’s order denying its motion to compel arbitration. We have jurisdiction under 9 U.S.C. § 16(a)(1)(C). We reverse and remand for entry of an order to compel arbitration.
I. BACKGROUND
EEC, Inc. (EEC) and Baker agreed in June 2009 for Baker to provide drilling equipment for use in EEC’s horizontal oil and natural gas well in Payne County, Oklahoma. The equipment was lost in the well. EEC filed suit in Oklahoma state court alleging that Baker’s negligence damaged its…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. CardegnaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Teresita J. Dumais v. American Golf Corporation, Doing Business as Paradise Hills Golf Club, a Foreign Corporation and William WinklerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Cummings v. Fedex Ground Package System, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Bluestem Brands, Inc. d/b/a Fingerhut v. Darlene ShadeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2017