Legal Opinion

United States of America, (87-5477), (87-5750, 87-5751) v. Bob Minarik and Aline K. Campbell, (87-5477), (87-5750, 87-5751)

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided August 7, 1989No. 87-5477, 87-5750 and 87-5751PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MERRITT, Circuit Judge.

This criminal fraud cause is brought under the second, or “defraud,” clause of 18 U.S.C. § 371, rather than the first, or “offense” clause. Section 371 reads as follows:

If two or more persons conspire either to commit any offense against the United States, or to defraud the United States, or any agency thereof in any manner or for any 'purpose, and one or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. If, however, the offense, the commission of which is…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. McNally v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Krulewitch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Grunewald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Dennis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. United States v. WiltbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1820

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. United States v. Paul A. BilzerianCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
  2. Franklin Sanders v. William E. Freeman, Jr. And Charles BursonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  3. United States v. David A. Sturman (90-3147) Ralph L. Levine (90-3148) Reuben Sturman (90-3151) and Melvin Kaminsky (90-3750)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
  4. United States v. TrieDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1998
  5. United States v. Arch Trading CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API