Legal Opinion
Landow v. Carmen
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided January 7, 1983No. Civ. Y-82-1520PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
JOSEPH H. YOUNG, District Judge.
Plaintiff Nathan Landow brought this suit pursuant to the Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2201, and the Quiet Title Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2409a, seeking a declara tion that defendant United States is not entitled to remain in possession of certain commercial office space. The United States moved to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. After careful consideration of the memoranda filed by the parties, the Court concludes that this suit is not cognizable under the Quiet Title Act and, therefore, the United States’ motion…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Malone v. BowdoinSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Kinscherff v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
- Alf Key v. Mrs. Louise P. WiseCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Micheal Chernick and Belle Chernick v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- McMaster v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
- Dunbar Corp. v. LindseyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
- Mafrige v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1995
- Pai 'Ohana v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1995
- Dunbar Corporation v. LindseyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.