Legal Opinion

Lynch v. Cunningham

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 12, 1933No. Docket No. 8668PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOOLING, J., pro tem.

This is an appeal by the plaintiff, as trustee in bankruptcy of Rose Murray, from a judgment denying equitable relief. Rose Murray is a daughter of one Dan Cunningham, who died in 1912. The estate of Dan Cunningham was distributed in 1913 in undivided interests, one-half to Margaret Cunningham, his. widow, and one-twelfth to each of his six children, including Rose Murray. On May 10, 1923, the mother and the six children created a trust designated as the Cunningham Estate Trust. In the creation of this trust the entire property, which consisted of real estate, was…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of FairCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Brown v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Crooke v. . County of KingsNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  4. Leese v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
  5. Gray v. Union Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1915

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In Re Raymond W. George TrustMontana Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Henigbaum v. ScottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  3. Hull v. RolfsrudNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Estate of BairdCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  5. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. Sparr Realty Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1937

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API