Legal Opinion

Hemenway v. Harrigan

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 26, 1934PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.

This is a suit brought in the Probate Court under G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 205, § 7A, to enforce directly the obligation of an administrator’s bond. The petitioners, the next of kin of the intestate, are distributees under a decree entered on May 9, 1932. The respondents are the administrator, hereafter called the respondent, who is the principal on the bond and the only party prosecuting the present appeal, and the surety on the bond, who waived its appeal. See Murray v. Massachusetts Bonding & Ins. Co. 283 Mass. 15.

The facts pertinent to this decision are these: The respondent was appointed…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Farquhar v. New England Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
  2. Brackett v. FullerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  3. Murray v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  4. White v. WeatherbeeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879
  5. McKim v. HaleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wilbur v. HallettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  2. Chase v. FaulknerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  3. Standard Rubber Co. v. CarberryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  4. Brockelman v. Western Surety Co.Massachusetts Superior Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API